<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:43:14 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Chesapeake Stormwater Network Latest News</title><link>http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/all-things-stormwater/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 23:50:59 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Mosquitos and Bioswales</title><category>Delaware</category><category>Research Update</category><category>bioswales</category><category>mosquitos</category><dc:creator>CSN</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:01:05 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/all-things-stormwater/mosquitos-and-bioswales.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">411935:5005083:6023426</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong>This&nbsp;is a <a href="http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/documents/research-files/Mosquitos20in20DE20Bioswales1.pdf">report on mosquito breeding in bioswales in Delaware</a> that Randy Greer of DNREC passed along to me recently. It offers some troubling data on potential mosquito production from these areas, and some prevention techniques.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/all-things-stormwater/rss-comments-entry-6023426.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Bioretention Hydrology</title><dc:creator>CSN</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:59:59 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/all-things-stormwater/bioretention-hydrology.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">411935:5005083:6023416</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong>A recent <a href="http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/documents/research-files/Bioretention20hydrology20paper1.pdf">paper on bioretention hydrologic performance</a>&nbsp; provides reliable data on how runoff reduction actually works within test bioretention cells. This solid paper also provides technical support for many of the Level 1 and 2 design criteria that are being proposed in the Commonwealth of Virginia.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/all-things-stormwater/rss-comments-entry-6023416.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Maryland Bioretention</title><category>Maryland</category><category>Research Update</category><category>bioretention</category><dc:creator>CSN</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:57:35 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/all-things-stormwater/maryland-bioretention.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">411935:5005083:6023400</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong>You can never read too many papers on bioretention. This 2008 offering by Dr. Allan Davis at University of Maryland provides an excellent summary of the hydrologic performance of two test bioretention areas, based on monitoring of many, many storms. <a href="http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/documents/research-files/JHE20Davios20Bioretention20Paper1.pdf">Click here.</a></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/all-things-stormwater/rss-comments-entry-6023400.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Talking Trash in Runoff</title><category>Research Update</category><category>gross pollutants</category><dc:creator>CSN</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:52:23 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/all-things-stormwater/talking-trash-in-runoff.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">411935:5005083:6023377</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>The last paper is a notable contribution from our fellow Australian stormwater geeks that looks at "gross pollutants" in stormwater &ndash; things like trash, debris, floatables and the like. We are often so nutri-centric in the Bay watershed that we often overlook the massive loads of these pollutants. Not so our fellow citizens, who are astonished by the trashiness of urban stormwater while walking along the Baltimore or Anacostia waterfront. <a href="http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/documents/research-files/SWGross-poll1.pdf">Click here</a> to learn more about urban grossness.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/all-things-stormwater/rss-comments-entry-6023377.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Industrial Stormwater Compliance</title><category>Research Update</category><dc:creator>CSN</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:49:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/all-things-stormwater/industrial-stormwater-compliance.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">411935:5005083:6023358</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>This report details how California assessed compliance levels at thousands of stormwater hotspots across many different industrial sectors. The report, prepared by Tetra- tech, chronicles the spotty compliance record at most industrial NPDES stormwater sites, but also documents on how it markedly improved after site audits, inspections and technical assistance were applied. Since we don't do such a great job in inspecting stormwater hotspots in the Bay watershed, folks may want to <a href="http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/documents/research-files/Industrial20Stormwater20Inspections1.pdf">click here</a> to find out ways to improve our game.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/all-things-stormwater/rss-comments-entry-6023358.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Phosphorus Fertilizer Bans Work in Minnesota</title><category>Research Update</category><category>fertilizer</category><dc:creator>CSN</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:34:47 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/all-things-stormwater/phosphorus-fertilizer-bans-work-in-minnesota.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">411935:5005083:6023293</guid><description><![CDATA[Product substitution is one of the most effective stormwater pollution control tools that we have, but we rarely wield it. Think for a minute about the dramatic reductions in lead concentrations in stormwater runoff that were achieved by the introduction of unleaded gasoline.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/all-things-stormwater/rss-comments-entry-6023293.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>LID Subdivision Monitoring</title><category>LID</category><category>Research Update</category><dc:creator>CSN</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:15:17 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/all-things-stormwater/lid-subdivision-monitoring.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">411935:5005083:6023224</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong> A paper by Bill Selbig and his colleagues in Wisconsin summarizes a six-year paired monitoring study of a traditional subdivision versus a subdivision that was designed with LID practices. The results indicate a significantly different hydrological response from the LID subdivision. Click <a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2008/5008/" target="_blank">here</a> for a copy.﻿</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/all-things-stormwater/rss-comments-entry-6023224.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Jordan Cove LID Monitoring Study</title><category>LID</category><category>Research Update</category><dc:creator>CSN</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:14:09 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/all-things-stormwater/jordan-cove-lid-monitoring-study.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">411935:5005083:6023218</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong>This long-awaited paper summarizes one of the nation&rsquo;s longest running LID research sites, the Jordan Cove Study. This updated review of the results of this landmark monitoring study can be <a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://jordancove.uconn.edu/jordan_cove/about.html" target="_blank">accessed here.</a></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/all-things-stormwater/rss-comments-entry-6023218.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>LID Costs for Redevelopment Sites</title><category>LID</category><category>Research Update</category><dc:creator>CSN</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:13:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/all-things-stormwater/lid-costs-for-redevelopment-sites.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">411935:5005083:6023215</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong>This 2008 report released by the Chesapeake Bay Foundation looks at the feasibility of Low-Impact Development practices using three real world urban redevelopment project sites in Maryland. Modeling showed that these practices enabled dense urban mixed-use redevelopment projects in Maryland to capture and filter/ infiltrate substantial volumes of stormwater at reasonable costs when compared with conventional (non-green) solutions such as underground storage tanks. This is an important finding as Bay states struggle to define more stringent stormwater requirements for redevelopment projects. To get a copy of their <a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://www.cbf.org/reports/2008_11_18-CBF_Report_full.pdf" target="_blank">study </a>and <a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://www.cbf.org/reports/ESD_study_letter.pdf" target="_blank">modeling assumptions</a> click here.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/all-things-stormwater/rss-comments-entry-6023215.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>President Obama’s Executive Order: Stormwater Recommendations</title><category>Policy Overview</category><dc:creator>CSN</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:58:30 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/all-things-stormwater/president-obamas-executive-order-stormwater-recommendations.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">411935:5005083:6013643</guid><description><![CDATA[President Obama issued an Executive Order 13508 last May to accelerate progress made to restore the Bay. The order called for EPA to report on the next generation of tools and actions to restore the Bay using existing regulatory authorities. The first reports were released in early September, and two of them focus heavily on stormwater.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.chesapeakestormwater.net/all-things-stormwater/rss-comments-entry-6013643.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>
